Jump to content


Remembered Today:

0

treatment of malaria in India in WW1


24 replies to this topic

#1 JaneCanadian

JaneCanadian

    Sergeant-Major

  • Members2
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Manitoulin Island, Canada

Posted 03 September 2009 - 01:50 AM

Another grandfather tidbit to follow-up..

My grandfather served in the RASC in India in 1918-1919 and he related a story about getting malaria from swimming in a river he had been warned not to swim in. He served in/near the Khyber pass.
I awlays thought malaria came from mosquitoes, not water ...however my question is does anyone know if  the treatment of malaria at that  time would require hospitalization or any references describing the incidence of malaria  in the British forces during that period?

Thank you
Jane  


#2 Piorun

Piorun

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,535 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland
  • Interests:Rugby football, golf, family research, military history, Scotch whisky, Polish vodka.

Posted 03 September 2009 - 02:51 AM

One type of malaria always required hospitalisation; that caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Others might. Your g/f did not get malaria from swimming in the river. If he got malaria, it was from a mosquito. However, malaria was often called "marsh fever" because, before Ross proved that it was carried by mosquitoes, people thought that the stagnant water in marshes or sluggish rivers, or even the humid air around those places, was the cause, not realising that these bodies of water were the breeding grounds of the carrier. It was also very common for a diagnosis of malaria to be made when, in fact, the patient has some other form of viral infection causing fever. I regret I have no information per se on the Indian situation re British troops. India wasn't considered a theatre of war at the time - although many served there with great dedication. Hope this helps. Antony

#3 JaneCanadian

JaneCanadian

    Sergeant-Major

  • Members2
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Manitoulin Island, Canada

Posted 04 September 2009 - 02:20 AM

QUOTE (Piorun @ Sep 2 2009, 10:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
One type of malaria always required hospitalisation; that caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Others might. Your g/f did not get malaria from swimming in the river. If he got malaria, it was from a mosquito. However, malaria was often called "marsh fever" because, before Ross proved that it was carried by mosquitoes, people thought that the stagnant water in marshes or sluggish rivers, or even the humid air around those places, was the cause, not realising that these bodies of water were the breeding grounds of the carrier. It was also very common for a diagnosis of malaria to be made when, in fact, the patient has some other form of viral infection causing fever. I regret I have no information per se on the Indian situation re British troops. India wasn't considered a theatre of war at the time - although many served there with great dedication. Hope this helps. Antony


Thank you that was quite informative. I was just wondering if malaria was common among the troops and how incapacitating it would have been.

Jane


#4 Sushil Talwar

Sushil Talwar

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 23 posts

Posted 04 September 2009 - 07:34 AM

QUOTE (JaneCanadian @ Sep 3 2009, 07:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Another grandfather tidbit to follow-up..

My grandfather served in the RASC in India in 1918-1919 and he related a story about getting malaria from swimming in a river he had been warned not to swim in. He served in/near the Khyber pass.
I awlays thought malaria came from mosquitoes, not water ...however my question is does anyone know if  the treatment of malaria at that  time would require hospitalization or any references describing the incidence of malaria  in the British forces during that period?

Thank you
Jane  


Jane,

Malaria mosquitoes breed where there is water more so where there is stagnant water. He could well have been bitten while swimming or while going in or out of the water.

Normally, malaria would require hospitalisation as it could prove fatal if not handled properly.

Rgds

Sushil



#5 centurion

centurion

    General

  • Old Sweats
  • 18,778 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Marches
  • Interests:Military history, science fiction

Posted 04 September 2009 - 09:40 AM

Having had malaria I can confirm that it will incapacitate and put the patient on their back. A mild dose (which is what I had) is like a very bad flu lasting a few days and does not necessarily require hospitalisation although you will be in bed. As has been said some forms can kill (especially the cerebral variety) and certainly require hospital treatment. One of the problems of even a mild attack is it can come back (I had four bouts each slightly milder than the previous, with 28 days between them, then a pause of about 6 months and then one final relatively mild attack- 20 years later I have my fingers crossed ) In WW1 treatment would probably have been quinine (same stuff you get in tonic water). As I understand it this kills red blood cells but tends to hit those that are damaged in some way first, this includes those infected with the malaria parasite. Today we have all sorts of prophylactics to ward it off but, as I can testify, they don't always work.

#6 Spud Trevor

Spud Trevor

    Captain

  • Old Sweats
  • 289 posts

Posted 04 September 2009 - 03:34 PM

Slightly off tangent, but I came across a chap who died of blackwater fever whilst serving in Africa. I'd never given it any thought but had always presumed blackwater referred to contaminated water, which if drunk gave you the disease. However, after a little digging around I found it to be a nasty type of malaria, which colours the urine a very dark colour - hence the blackwater. I've read but can't vouch for its validity that drinking excessive amounts of quinnine to ward off malaria is possibly linked to the blackwater variety.
Regards,
Spud

#7 centurion

centurion

    General

  • Old Sweats
  • 18,778 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Marches
  • Interests:Military history, science fiction

Posted 04 September 2009 - 05:11 PM

Spud

Drinking large amounts of quinine does absolutely nothing to ward off malaria (I suspect that it was an excuse for the Sahibs knocking back the GiTs on the veranda of the Scinde Club (now unfortunately dry but they recently used to do good lunches if you could wangle an invite). It has some effect if you've got it (malaria). Unfortunately drinking too much of it can do damage to your production of red blood cells. One of the "two fat ladies" recently recounted how in the time when she was a deb in the swinging sixties and an alcoholic that it turned out that it wasn't so much the bath tub amounts of gin that did the damage but the swimming pool volumes of tonic - because of the quinine)

#8 Piorun

Piorun

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,535 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland
  • Interests:Rugby football, golf, family research, military history, Scotch whisky, Polish vodka.

Posted 06 September 2009 - 02:29 AM

Darn it, Centurion; you've just knocked away one of my excuses  biggrin.gif  
Seriously; I'm glad you're in remission (or cured). It's a nasty infection and, as you rightly point out, would make a man pretty unfit for active service for several days at a time. The Army Malaria Institute reckoned that half of the Desert Mounted Corps in Palestine during WW1 were immobilised by the disease and a hundred died. Obviously, such percentages did not apply to the Western Front. However, I'm not sure about India - which was Jane's question. Antony.

#9 JaneCanadian

JaneCanadian

    Sergeant-Major

  • Members2
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Manitoulin Island, Canada

Posted 10 September 2009 - 03:48 AM

Thank you for all the personal and other info about malaria.

Being in Northern Ontario, I am more than familar with the link between standing water and mosquito breeding ... don't even ask how this summer was for mosquitoes..  fortunately they don't carry malaria here..

I had been wondering if my grandfather would have been hospitalized or not .. and of course if there were any  records related to that to be found...  

You were all very helpful,

Jane

#10 Piorun

Piorun

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,535 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland
  • Interests:Rugby football, golf, family research, military history, Scotch whisky, Polish vodka.

Posted 11 September 2009 - 04:28 PM

Jane: there might well be records extant. Given that India at the time was not a "theatre of war", the miltary hospitals would be islands of relative calm and good organisation where records might be more detailed as to name rank and serial number - even of Other Ranks. I regret that such information on the Indian front is outwith my field of interest but some digging could prove fruitful. I see to recall that there are some good threads in this Forum dealing with nursing and hospital work. Good luck. Antony

#11 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 14 September 2009 - 09:33 PM

Slightly off tangent but still relevant.....

My Uncle died in India in 1946 in WW2 of Malaria while serving in the Sikh Light Infantry.

I am trying to research his life but records are sketchy.

The point I would make is this......thirty years or so after treating people for the disease in WW1, troops were still susceptible to Malaria.

I have no idea how bad he had it, how he caught it or what treatment he was given but it was a bad enough strain to kill him.



#12 Sushil Talwar

Sushil Talwar

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 23 posts

Posted 15 September 2009 - 06:58 AM

QUOTE (Parky62 @ Sep 15 2009, 04:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Slightly off tangent but still relevant.....

My Uncle died in India in 1946 in WW2 of Malaria while serving in the Sikh Light Infantry.

I am trying to research his life but records are sketchy.

The point I would make is this......thirty years or so after treating people for the disease in WW1, troops were still susceptible to Malaria.

I have no idea how bad he had it, how he caught it or what treatment he was given but it was a bad enough strain to kill him.


What was your uncles name?

Sushil

#13 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 15 September 2009 - 10:14 AM

QUOTE (Sushil Talwar @ Sep 15 2009, 07:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What was your uncles name?

Sushil


Hi Sushil,

2nd Lieutenant David Johnston McKie PARK (368654)......he is buried in Rawalpindi Cemetry.

As I have said, I don't know much about him. He served with the Black Watch (Royal Highlanders) before being attached to the SLI.

If you have any info or can point me in the right direction i would appreciate it.

Tony

#14 Sushil Talwar

Sushil Talwar

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 23 posts

Posted 16 September 2009 - 08:20 AM

QUOTE (Parky62 @ Sep 15 2009, 04:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi Sushil,

2nd Lieutenant David Johnston McKie PARK (368654)......he is buried in Rawalpindi Cemetry.

As I have said, I don't know much about him. He served with the Black Watch (Royal Highlanders) before being attached to the SLI.

If you have any info or can point me in the right direction i would appreciate it.

Tony


Tony,

Do you know the Battalion he served in? The SLI had three battalions.  I'll have a look at the regiment's history today and revert.

Sushil

#15 judithb

judithb

    Major

  • Old Sweats
  • 487 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 16 September 2009 - 09:28 AM

I have the service records for one of the men I am researching who was serving in Salonika, I know it's not India, but his records show he was hospitalised several times with malaria.

#16 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 16 September 2009 - 10:27 AM

QUOTE (Sushil Talwar @ Sep 16 2009, 09:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Tony,

Do you know the Battalion he served in? The SLI had three battalions.  I'll have a look at the regiment's history today and revert.

Sushil



Hi,

I think he was in the third battalion

Thanks

#17 Sushil Talwar

Sushil Talwar

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 23 posts

Posted 17 September 2009 - 06:59 AM

QUOTE (Parky62 @ Sep 16 2009, 04:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi,

I think he was in the third battalion

Thanks


Tony,

I've had a look at the regimental history of the Sikh LI and am surprised not to find your uncles name there. The SLI had very few British officers, how the regimental historian missed out his name is a bit of a mystery. I'll check the IA List on my next visit to the USI which should shed light on his stint with the SLI.

When SLI was raised several names were considered including Sikh Rifles, Sikh Fusiliers and The Sikh Brenadiers, finally Gen Savory suggested Sikh LI. The 3rd Bn was riased on 15 Aug 1942 and they saw service in Thal, Kurram Valley and Ramzak. They came from Wana to Madras sometime in July 1947.

Sushil

#18 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 17 September 2009 - 09:03 AM

QUOTE (Sushil Talwar @ Sep 17 2009, 07:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Tony,

I've had a look at the regimental history of the Sikh LI and am surprised not to find your uncles name there. The SLI had very few British officers, how the regimental historian missed out his name is a bit of a mystery. I'll check the IA List on my next visit to the USI which should shed light on his stint with the SLI.

When SLI was raised several names were considered including Sikh Rifles, Sikh Fusiliers and The Sikh Brenadiers, finally Gen Savory suggested Sikh LI. The 3rd Bn was riased on 15 Aug 1942 and they saw service in Thal, Kurram Valley and Ramzak. They came from Wana to Madras sometime in July 1947.

Sushil


Hi Sushil,

If you go to the CWGC site he is quoted as being in this regiment and buried in Rawalpindi.

Unfortunately no one in the family can provide any further concrete information. All I have in my possession are a couple of small old photographs from India (?) in April 1946.

I appreciate any help you can provide.

Many Thanks

Tony

#19 Sushil Talwar

Sushil Talwar

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 23 posts

Posted 18 September 2009 - 11:23 AM

QUOTE (Parky62 @ Sep 17 2009, 03:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi Sushil,

If you go to the CWGC site he is quoted as being in this regiment and buried in Rawalpindi.

Unfortunately no one in the family can provide any further concrete information. All I have in my possession are a couple of small old photographs from India (?) in April 1946.

I appreciate any help you can provide.

Many Thanks

Tony


Tony,

Are sure it is Rawalpindi. As far as I know there is no CWGC Cemetry in Rawalpindi. Pls recheck and revert.

Rgds

Sushil

#20 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 18 September 2009 - 04:02 PM

QUOTE (Sushil Talwar @ Sep 18 2009, 12:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Tony,

Are sure it is Rawalpindi. As far as I know there is no CWGC Cemetry in Rawalpindi. Pls recheck and revert.

Rgds

Sushil


Hi Sushil,

Please see attachment.

It refers to both his service in the Sikh LI and his burial at Rawalpindi

Thanks

http://www.cwgc.org/search/casualty_detail...asualty=2178716

#21 matthew lucas

matthew lucas

    Major

  • Old Sweats
  • 473 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leamington Spa
  • Interests:Collecting Great War memoribilia, Family history, battlefield visits, Commonwealth forces

Posted 18 September 2009 - 04:22 PM

QUOTE (judithb @ Sep 16 2009, 10:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have the service records for one of the men I am researching who was serving in Salonika, I know it's not India, but his records show he was hospitalised several times with malaria.


indeed my grandfather who served in salonika was downgraded B2 in 1918 and moved to the labour corps, 30% disability pension after the war, cause? Malaria, Dysentry and Broncitus, had malaria regularly till he died 30 years later. he spent april-july 1918 in hospital then no convelesent camp in salonika, so yes it did knock you down a bit
matt

#22 Sushil Talwar

Sushil Talwar

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 23 posts

Posted 19 September 2009 - 09:13 AM

QUOTE (Parky62 @ Sep 18 2009, 10:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi Sushil,

Please see attachment.

It refers to both his service in the Sikh LI and his burial at Rawalpindi

Thanks

http://www.cwgc.org/search/casualty_detail...asualty=2178716


Tony,

WOW! This is what I get when I type "Park" and the period 1946!

Will revert once I've seen the IALs.

Sushil blink.gif

Casualty Details
Name: PARK, DAVID JOHNSTONE McKIE
Initials: D J M
Nationality: Indian
Rank: Second Lieutenant
Regiment/Service: Sikh Light Infantry
Unit Text: 3rd Bn.
Age: 23
Date of Death: 05/07/1946
Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead
Grave/Memorial Reference: Face 47.
Memorial: RANGOON MEMORIAL
      
Home  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Useful Links  |  Debt of Honour  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Credits


#23 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 20 September 2009 - 11:38 AM

QUOTE (Sushil Talwar @ Sep 19 2009, 10:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Tony,

WOW! This is what I get when I type "Park" and the period 1946!

Will revert once I've seen the IALs.

Sushil blink.gif

Casualty Details
Name: PARK, DAVID JOHNSTONE McKIE
Initials: D J M
Nationality: Indian
Rank: Second Lieutenant
Regiment/Service: Sikh Light Infantry
Unit Text: 3rd Bn.
Age: 23
Date of Death: 05/07/1946
Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead
Grave/Memorial Reference: Face 47.
Memorial: RANGOON MEMORIAL
      
Home  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Useful Links  |  Debt of Honour  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Credits


Hi Sushil,

That is two references with slightly different spellings!

David Johnston McKee PARK and David Johnstone McKie PARK.

Both on the CWGC site.

I can tell you categorically that he was born in Glasgow in 1923 and so is NOT an Indian national. The rest of the information is all the same on each reference, although one says Rangoon and the other Rawalpindi. It would be nice to clear all this up.

I have sent away for his birth certificate so that I can get a confirmation on the name spellings, but the two different references certainly confuse things as a researcher.

I have some old photos of him in India and on the back of one dated April 1946, it says....."Here I am in my civvies, I hope to wear them very soon when I see you"

He died two months later.

Thanks for looking into this at your end, I really appreciate it.

Tony

#24 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 21 September 2009 - 03:55 PM

QUOTE (judithb @ Sep 16 2009, 10:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have the service records for one of the men I am researching who was serving in Salonika, I know it's not India, but his records show he was hospitalised several times with malaria.


Judith...

I also had a great uncle who served in the Cyclists Corps in Greece. He went over to Salonika in 1917 and was hospitalised with Malaria at Sarigol, Kalamaria and at Hortiach at various times.

His records show that after his second bout, they put him on light duties which was working in Sanitation. Given that 60,000+ troops were struggling with some form of Malaria in Salonika at the time......i'm not sure that job would have helped him recover too much. But I suppose someone had to do it!

From reports I have read of that campaign, two thirds of the troops suffered from the disease and they even had to burn half of the area to get a 'clean' spot to put the temporary hospital which contained 2000 beds.

Crazy!



#25 Parky62

Parky62

    Corporal

  • Members2
  • 20 posts

Posted 27 September 2009 - 05:57 PM

QUOTE (Parky62 @ Sep 20 2009, 12:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi Sushil,

That is two references with slightly different spellings!

David Johnston McKee PARK and David Johnstone McKie PARK.

Both on the CWGC site.

I can tell you categorically that he was born in Glasgow in 1923 and so is NOT an Indian national. The rest of the information is all the same on each reference, although one says Rangoon and the other Rawalpindi. It would be nice to clear all this up.

I have sent away for his birth certificate so that I can get a confirmation on the name spellings, but the two different references certainly confuse things as a researcher.

I have some old photos of him in India and on the back of one dated April 1946, it says....."Here I am in my civvies, I hope to wear them very soon when I see you"

He died two months later.

Thanks for looking into this at your end, I really appreciate it.

Tony


Hi Sushil,

Just received my Uncle's birth certificate and can confirm that his name is David Johnston McKee PARK however records still refer to Johnstone McKie.....

Regardless, I would still appreciate any help you can provide.

Thanks

Tony




Reply to this topic