Jump to content


Remembered Today:

0

Channel 4 Time Team Special


84 replies to this topic

#26 roughdiamond

roughdiamond

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Airdrie (in Scotland, not Canada)

Posted 15 April 2011 - 07:11 AM

View PostChris_Baker, on 15 April 2011 - 07:07 AM, said:

Was the "1 July" specimen uncovered on the programme actually used in anger?

According to the programme Chris it was disabled due to a shell strike that prior to being used, thay did say though that others were used elsewhere on 1st July and once more in 1917.

Sam

#27 Chris_Baker

Chris_Baker

    General

  • Old Sweat
  • 12,709 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Warwickshire UK
  • Interests:see me at www.1914-1918.net

Posted 15 April 2011 - 07:24 AM

Thank you. So where were the other "1 July" specimens? I only ask as I have never seen them referred to in any diary, regimental or official history I have read covering that period.

#28 Jonathan Saunders

Jonathan Saunders

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 5,001 posts

Posted 15 April 2011 - 07:45 AM

A most impressive programme and a credit to all involved (despite my initial fears over the now annoying presence of Tony Robinson).  

So do I call Mametz "Mametz" or "Mam-may"?

Regards,

Jonathan S



#29 kmcgee

kmcgee

    Captain

  • Old Sweats
  • 272 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East Dorset

Posted 15 April 2011 - 07:58 AM

View PostChris_Baker, on 15 April 2011 - 07:24 AM, said:

Thank you. So where were the other "1 July" specimens? I only ask as I have never seen them referred to in any diary, regimental or official history I have read covering that period.


Hello Chris

A Livens Flame Projector was used at 7.30am  on 1st July to fire across the western edge of Crater Field. That is north of Carnoy. About half way between Carnoy and Montauban Alley.

A detailed diagram is shown in Osprey Campaign (169) Somme 1st July 1916 Tragedy and Triumph (pages 70 and 71). The photo used in the programme of the machine belching flame is also included.

A copy of part of the page is attached. Size limitations only allow this.



Kevin

Attached Files



#30 skipman

skipman

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 7,882 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:aberfeldy

Posted 15 April 2011 - 08:08 AM

The Somme's Secret Weapon

Complete with Adverts.

Mike

#31 Chris_Baker

Chris_Baker

    General

  • Old Sweat
  • 12,709 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Warwickshire UK
  • Interests:see me at www.1914-1918.net

Posted 15 April 2011 - 08:24 AM

Thanks, Kevin. Good diagram, by the way. It is even mentioned in the OH and I had completely forgotten about it.

#32 Staffsyeoman

Staffsyeoman

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,042 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London UK
  • Interests:Royal Warwickshire Regiment, Medals and Awards, uniform

Posted 15 April 2011 - 08:27 AM

One of the better of its kind, well done all. And quite a wake up call for anyone who says 'History? It's all been don." We know better, eh?

I have always been averse to flamethrowers - even manpack ones - one weapon I'd certainly ban (yes, I know large scale ones were banned in the 20s). But even my jaw dropped at the effect.

Congratulations to the makers; want to see the longer version, and if it gets released, I'll buy it.

#33 David Faulder

David Faulder

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,980 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:3rd, 1/4th, 14th Battalions York and Lancaster Regiment

Posted 15 April 2011 - 09:19 AM

View Postiain mchenry, on 15 April 2011 - 06:16 AM, said:

>><<
The two French soldiers that were exhumed from the site by GUARD were initially handed to the CWGC and then on to the relevant French Authorities. We were a little dissapointed when we learnt that they had been buried, without notice, in a French military cemetery locally a few months later. Many of us from the team, and I am sure, locals would have attended their burials.

Best regards

Iain
Spawned a separate discussion in the Recovering the Fallen Sub-forum, initially asking if anyone has more details.

David

#34 Gunner Bailey

Gunner Bailey

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,719 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent / Somme
  • Interests:WW1 Field Gear mainly grenades and artillery items, WW2 Home Front, Aviation (Mainly WW2), V1s / V2s and their sites but also WW1 airfields. The Somme, in all its aspects.

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:06 AM

View PostJonathan Saunders, on 15 April 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

A most impressive programme and a credit to all involved (despite my initial fears over the now annoying presence of Tony Robinson).  

So do I call Mametz "Mametz" or "Mam-may"?

Regards,

Jonathan S

Well spotted Jonathan. A friend of mine who visits the area annually from the US calls Mametz 'Mam-may', and I always think what about the town of Metz? Nobody calls that 'May'

As my grandfather fought at Mametz (a Sapper), I'd like to get the pronounciation right.

By the way I thought the programme was excellent and the work done to recreate the weapon in Kent was a real credit to the Royal Engineers.

John

#35 ianw

ianw

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 5,740 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:14 AM

The fact that really blew me away was that it only took 25 weeks in 1916 to get from the point of the idea's conception to actually using the weapon.

Whilst understandably delighted with their finds, perhaps more should have been made of the weapons place in the evolution of the much more important (although rather mundane) Livens Projector i.e the process of establishing how can we cheaply and effectively lob all sorts of different nastiness at the enemy.

I am sure the full length version of the programme makes good on this.

#36 squirrel

squirrel

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 7,062 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Woodhall Spa Lincolnshire
  • Interests:World War 1 - 18th Londons, 141 Brigade, 47th Div.

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:15 AM

Excellent programme and a credit to all concerned.

My one thought at the end though was what did they do with the thing after enemy positions in range were cleared?
The effort in dismantling and moving it elsewhere must have been of epic proportions.
Mind you, the was never a shortage of labour at the time.

#37 ianw

ianw

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 5,740 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:20 AM

View Postsquirrel, on 15 April 2011 - 10:15 AM, said:

The effort in dismantling and moving it elsewhere must have been of epic proportions.

Yes, I don't think this may have been fully considered in the enthusiasm of designing and building it. Does anyone know who signed off on the construction. It must have cost a fortune.

I wonder if the battle use which must have been spectacular was witnessed by anyone over the rank of Lt Colonel? I somehow doubt it.

#38 edwin astill

edwin astill

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 707 posts
  • Location:Sheffield
  • Interests:7th Infantry Brigade (especially 1st Wilts, 3rd Worcs)

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:22 AM

Interesting.  Never realised just what a terror weapon it was.   Like others, I do wish Baldrick wasn't running about like Anika Rice (remember her?)and making silly comments.

Edwin

#39 roughdiamond

roughdiamond

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Airdrie (in Scotland, not Canada)

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:41 AM

I'll be honest, if I was Tony Robinson, I'd also be running about like a gibbering looney with the excitement. Just a quick hats off to the excellent Tony Pollard who I've been a fan of since I watched the first episodes of "Two men in a Trench" with Neil (he looks like Dracula) Oliver.

Sam

#40 seadog

seadog

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,567 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol UK

Posted 15 April 2011 - 10:55 AM

Watched the prog last night, unfortunately in between snoozing, however a couple of points spring to mind. The first is was it really necessary to undertake a large archeological excavation to tell the story of the flame device; surely this would have been much better done as a straightforward documentary to include war diary entries, experiences of those PBI who actually operated the thing etc. The reconstruction could still have been included and we would I believe have learnt a lot more than watching the usual detritus being excavated from the battlefields.

The most important part of the prog to me was the finding of the human remains to which a very brief period was allocated. Perhaps someone can clarify this point by telling us when and where the remains were buried and if it was possible to at least identify a nationality for this poor soul as I think that I saw some buttons in the film.  I cannot recall the CWGC announcing his interment on their website in the recent past. A last general point please Tony Robinson find another job ASAP!.

Norman

Edited to add: Noted that apparently there were two sets of human remains found which were again apparently identified as French although none of this info was in the prog.

#41 J Banning

J Banning

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweat
  • 1,082 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol

Posted 15 April 2011 - 11:02 AM

I'll do my best to answer all of the questions that have been posed throughout this thread. The Time Team version was a shortened version of the longer programme entitled 'Breathing Fire' made by Canadian company Cream Productions. The longer version will be shown internationally in November on (I think) History Channel. I'll post details when I get them. As far as I know there are no plans to produce a DVD – Cream will have to wait and see how the longer version fares and then make a judgement.

The tube section really was found on the last day and it was (as the TV people love to say) a genuine race against time. The dig had run for three weeks which, unlike the formulaic usual Time Teams, gave plenty of time to excavate and catalogue sections of the front line system as well as the entrances to Sap 14. It was decided that with the finding of the projector tube plus the earlier finds of the valve and tools that the project could certainly be considered a success and only by greatly enlarging the hole could the further suspected pieces have been excavated. There simply wasn't the time, inclination or budget to do this. I have an idea of the budget and it was well funded – certainly vastly more so than you would normally get for a Time Team. However, the choice of extending it a few more days simply wasn't possible.

After the filming was finished the incline and other excavated sections were filled in and the 2ft or so of topsoil that had been stored in separate piles was spread back over the land. I was at the site last week with a client and there is no way of knowing what happened there in 1916, let alone last May.

Terry – I am yet to watch the programme but will do so once I have posted this. I am surprised at them saying it was used again in May 1917 – it was actually used at Dixmuide in October 1917. It appears that TT did some of their own narrative and this wasn't run past us, hence why they said it was used in May.

There were actually many more firings than that one alone in 1917. Two machines were put into High Wood for the 18 August attack but were damaged by British artillery. However, on 3 September four flammenwerfer were used in High Wood (also one used near Arrow Head Copse in front of Guillemont on the same day) and then on 9 September three were fired in High Wood (the one in Sap 5 having been damaged in the period 3-9 September). There was then a delay of over a year before a request was made by the Belgian forces for a flame projector to be brought up Dixmuide to fire a jet against the Germans.  

We are planning to write a book on the British use and development of flamethrowers when time permits – perhaps in a couple of years?  I have loads of details from my work for the project but there is much still to do. I was at Toutencourt the other day where they were based and it felt strange after reading so much about the place and the test firings in the wood.

For those visiting the Somme between June and December who are interested then I would wholeheartedly recommend the forthcoming exhibition at the Historial in Peronne which will feature loads more information, images, drawings and maps along with the machine parts recovered from the dig plus a remarkable full-size replica made by students in French technical colleges. We met the man in charge of this yesterday and it is terrific what he has achieved. See the Historial page for details plus a good CGI film of the machine. http://www.historial...ves=webmaster.The 'monitor' or head of the modern RE recreation will also be on dispay too with (we hope) sections of the film.  

All of the basic information about the Livens Flame Projectors including maps, photos and line drawings was included in the 2006 version of our panorama book 'The Somme – a new panoramic perspective'.  We have added some new stuff into the 2011 reprint – see 'The Somme – the unseen panoramas'.

I wrote a piece on my site about the evolution of the project plus images and location maps which may explain some of the queries. See "The Time Team Special dig at Mametz – the evolution and structure of the project behind the search for the Livens Large Gallery Flame Projector".  

Peter and I were on the Somme yesterday for meetings and so missed the transmission as we didn't get back into the UK until ten past nine but had the rather bizarre experience of my following #timeteam updates on Twitter on my phone. It's a very strange way to gauge reaction!

Best wishes,
Jeremy

P.S. Just seen the last few posts – following a successful firing the machine would normally be taken apart by its crew and then carried back in pieces by an infantry carrying party. The one at the site at Mametz was carried up by a party of the Devons (8th or 9th Battalion). The sheer physical endeavour of the entire process of trench warfare; digging, revetting, fixing and repairing duckboards, filling sandbags etc. plus the physical slog of carrying parties was something that I really picked up whilst on site. I was shattered at the end of each day and we all concluded that 'they don't make them like they used to' when it came to lower backs as the majority of us were aching and could only marvel once again at that generation and what the men actually did (and that is not even including the fighting).

The museum exhibition is the initial place to go for more information and, hopefully, in due course we will produce a book on the subject.

#42 paul@bolton

paul@bolton

    Captain

  • Old Sweats
  • 288 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bolton but from t'other side of hills

Posted 15 April 2011 - 11:04 AM

Superb programme - thoroughly enjoyed it. Having seen how deep the archaeologists had to dig to find the thing, I now understand why I didn't find it myself when I walked over that field a couple of years ago  :rolleyes:  

Having raised the question over how to pronounce Mametz in another thread recently, I would also like to have THE definitive answer please. Although, quite honestly, I am now happy to continue to say 'Mamets' not 'Mammay' just because Tony Robinson says the latter (and stick with Siegfried Sassoon who rhymed it with 'parapets').

Several non-GWF friends have phoned me this morning to say they watched the programme and where can they learn more so, well done, Peter Barton and all concerned for an excellent combination of entertainment and education.

Paul

#43 J Banning

J Banning

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweat
  • 1,082 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol

Posted 15 April 2011 - 11:06 AM

Paul - it's pronounced Mammay. That is how the Mayor and villagers themselves say it so if it is good enough for them....:D

#44 roughdiamond

roughdiamond

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,795 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Airdrie (in Scotland, not Canada)

Posted 15 April 2011 - 11:14 AM

View Postseadog, on 15 April 2011 - 10:55 AM, said:

experiences of those PBI who actually operated the thing etc.

The most important part of the prog to me was the finding of the human remains to which a very brief period was allocated. Perhaps someone can clarify this point by telling us when and where the remains were buried and if it was possible to at least identify a nationality for this poor soul as I think that I saw some buttons in the film.  I cannot recall the CWGC announcing his interment on their website in the recent past. A last general point please Tony Robinson find another job ASAP!.

Norman

Edited to add: Noted that apparently there were two sets of human remains found which were again apparently identified as French although none of this info was in the prog.

Norman read Iain McHenry's post #22 for what happened to the 2 sets of remains, also the PBI didn't "actually operate the thing", it was constructed and operated by His Majesty's Royal Engineers with the Rank and pay of a Sapper :hypocrite:

Sam

#45 Roger H

Roger H

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,072 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham
  • Interests:311th Brigade RFA. The salient from Boezinge to Ploegsteert and the Arras area. Moseley Rugby Club. British real ale and Belgian Beer.

Posted 15 April 2011 - 12:13 PM

Great programme, horrible weapon.

Roger

#46 seaJane

seaJane

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,402 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Somerset or Hampshire depending
  • Interests:The West Africa squadron in the 1840s; naval medicine; First World War, especially in poetry, art and fiction

Posted 15 April 2011 - 01:25 PM

Agreed. Doesn't bear thinking about...

#47 paul@bolton

paul@bolton

    Captain

  • Old Sweats
  • 288 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bolton but from t'other side of hills

Posted 15 April 2011 - 01:27 PM

Jeremy,

Thanks. Mammay it is then. I will see Tony Robinson in a new light and listen with greater respect henceforth.

Paul

#48 Rockdoc

Rockdoc

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,322 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Derby, UK
  • Interests:Motorcycle touring, aquaria and ponds, family history

Posted 15 April 2011 - 03:06 PM

I thoroughly enjoyed the programme and, like others, was horrified by the demonstration. God help anyone who was at the receiving end.

Keith

#49 Gunner Bailey

Gunner Bailey

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,719 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent / Somme
  • Interests:WW1 Field Gear mainly grenades and artillery items, WW2 Home Front, Aviation (Mainly WW2), V1s / V2s and their sites but also WW1 airfields. The Somme, in all its aspects.

Posted 15 April 2011 - 03:10 PM

View Postpaul@bolton, on 15 April 2011 - 01:27 PM, said:

Jeremy,

Thanks. Mammay it is then. I will see Tony Robinson in a new light and listen with greater respect henceforth.

Paul

This sounds odd but just because the locals call in Mammay does not mean it's right. Locals in the Somme and the Pas De Calais (especially) tend to crop words in a way that sometimes makes their very French difficult to follow. I suspect this is what has happened to Mametz. It still does not answer my question how to the French pronounce the town of Metz. I bet it's not May.

John

#50 Mark Hone

Mark Hone

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,625 posts

Posted 15 April 2011 - 03:31 PM

The pronunciation of Mametz is also being discussed on another thread.