Jump to content


Remembered Today:

0

Honorary Lieutenant Medal Naming - Not a QM


11 replies to this topic

#1 HMSWildfire

HMSWildfire

    Lance-Corporal

  • Members2
  • 14 posts

Posted 28 July 2012 - 05:57 PM

I am looking at a MIC for Fred Coulson which shows him as a 2nd Lt. GHQ Sig Company Machine Gun Corps and then as a Honorary Lieutenant Royal Engineers. He earned the 1915 star, BWM & Victory medal,.
Please can anyone tell me if they would be engraved as a second lieutenant, lieutenant or Hon. Lieutenant?

#2 IPT

IPT

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,982 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wirral

Posted 28 July 2012 - 06:37 PM

There is a BWM on this medal website (2nd medal down) which is for Lieut F Coulson. - http://webcache.goog...n&ct=clnk&gl=uk

I can't see any other Lt F Coulsons in the Gazette, so it may be his?

#3 HMSWildfire

HMSWildfire

    Lance-Corporal

  • Members2
  • 14 posts

Posted 28 July 2012 - 07:06 PM

Thanks very much for this,I will give them a ring, i guess they did not use the honorary on the naming.

#4 Andrew Upton

Andrew Upton

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,958 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near Bristol
  • Interests:Collecting the uniforms, arms, accoutrements and medals primarily of the Commonwealth countries from WW1, as well as being a member of the Great War living history group The Vickers Machine Gunners Society 1914-45. Looking for anything militarily related to the names of COSST, DENSLEY, DUREPAIRE, SHOPLAND and UPTON.

Posted 29 July 2012 - 12:33 AM

View PostIPT, on 28 July 2012 - 06:37 PM, said:

There is a BWM on this medal website (2nd medal down) which is for Lieut F Coulson. - http://webcache.goog...=clnk&gl=uk I can't see any other Lt F Coulsons in the Gazette, so it may be his?

View PostHMSWildfire, on 28 July 2012 - 07:06 PM, said:

Thanks very much for this,I will give them a ring, i guess they did not use the honorary on the naming.

It is for A Lt. F. Coulson - a search of the MIC's brings up at least one other Lt. F. Coulson who would have a BWM so named, more likely so if Honorary in some form was supposed to have been used:

http://www.nationala...;resultcount=45


#5 HMSWildfire

HMSWildfire

    Lance-Corporal

  • Members2
  • 14 posts

Posted 29 July 2012 - 08:25 AM

Thanks for pointing this out, as you say it does not have honorary as a prefix so probably not my man.

#6 old owl

old owl

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,438 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Yorkshire, uk

Posted 29 July 2012 - 09:23 AM

View PostHMSWildfire, on 28 July 2012 - 05:57 PM, said:

I am looking at a MIC for Fred Coulson which shows him as a 2nd Lt. GHQ Sig Company Machine Gun Corps and then as a Honorary Lieutenant Royal Engineers. He earned the 1915 star, BWM & Victory medal,.
Please can anyone tell me if they would be engraved as a second lieutenant, lieutenant or Hon. Lieutenant?

I am pretty certain that his BWM & VM would be named as Lieut.F.Coulson.  I don't think that the Honorary bit would be included, or at least I don't recall having ever seen this part impressed on a WW1 medal, if it were in this case it would be impressed Hon.Lieut.F.Coulson.

Of course, and I have come across this on several occasions, the medal was impressed Lieut.Hon.----, then this has a totally different meaning which is of course a shortening of Lieutenant The Honourable----.

#7 IPT

IPT

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,982 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wirral

Posted 29 July 2012 - 12:22 PM

As he served as a 2nd Lt but was given the honorary promotion upon retirement, would his star differ from the other two medals?

#8 old owl

old owl

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,438 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Yorkshire, uk

Posted 29 July 2012 - 02:02 PM

View PostIPT, on 29 July 2012 - 12:22 PM, said:

As he served as a 2nd Lt but was given the honorary promotion upon retirement, would his star differ from the other two medals?

You could be right, he may be just '2.Lieut.' on the pair as well--but it seems strange that the rank is shown as 'Hon Lieut' on his MIC, which is not an official rank whilst serving--at least I don't think that it is?  Usually MIC's are marked to show which rank should be impressed upon which medals, I don't think that it is in this case? Which has to leave any thoughts on this open to conjecture.

#9 old owl

old owl

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,438 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Yorkshire, uk

Posted 29 July 2012 - 02:16 PM

IPT,

I have just checked my October 1917 Army List and he is still listed under Royal Engineers, ref. 810f  under 'Temp.and Acting Lieutenants' dated 9/11/15.  Based on this I would guess that his 1914/15 Star will be impressed '2.Lieut'  and his BWM & VM will be impressed 'Lieut.'

That's my take on anyway. :thumbsup:

Robert

#10 HMSWildfire

HMSWildfire

    Lance-Corporal

  • Members2
  • 14 posts

Posted 04 August 2012 - 12:45 PM

All,
Thank you very much for taking the time to post on this subject, it has given me a bit better understanding of the Honorary term.

#11 Jim Strawbridge

Jim Strawbridge

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,257 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 04:48 PM

View Postold owl, on 29 July 2012 - 09:23 AM, said:

I am pretty certain that his BWM & VM would be named as Lieut.F.Coulson.  I don't think that the Honorary bit would be included, or at least I don't recall having ever seen this part impressed on a WW1 medal, if it were in this case it would be impressed Hon.Lieut.F.Coulson.

Where appropriate the Hon. is placed on the medals. I have in my collections WW1 medals named to :-

HON.LT. A.A. ANDREWS.  (trio)
HON. CAPT. W.J. NORMAN. (pair)

(note - Lt. (not Lieut) as seen on some oversea's officer's medals).

#12 Terry

Terry

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,508 posts
  • Location:New Brunswick, Canada
  • Interests:The CEF and the 1914 BEF

Posted 02 September 2012 - 06:23 PM

i have been curious about a similar situation. A recent auction catalogue features a trio with the star named to a corporal, Canadian Engineers, while the pair are named HON.CAPT. The fellow was commissioned, but I am puzzled about the "Hon." part of the rank. I had assumed that normally it referred to QM officers commissioned from the ranks back in the good old days, or possibly even chaplains, but I can't figure out this particular case.
Cheers,
Terry