Jump to content


Remembered Today:

0

Whats on top of this helmet ?


23 replies to this topic

#1 dundeesown

dundeesown

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,636 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:25 PM

In the DundeeTelegraph tonight a story about the desecration of the War Memorials in and around Dundee has this picture to go with the story,but what has the lad on top of his helmet ? any ideas ?
Attached File  fallen.jpg   92.78K   35 downloads
Gary.

#2 THE SHINY SEVENTH

THE SHINY SEVENTH

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,205 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Essex
  • Interests:7th (city of london) Battalion
    Researching the Rainham War Memorial

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:29 PM

Could it be the hessian cover for helmet rolled up and tied in place? Regards Sean

#3 Joe Sweeney

Joe Sweeney

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweat
  • 2,020 posts

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:40 PM

I think it might be a ratty Hessian cover with the one side that is not attached well being blown by the wind.

Other than that it might be a proto punk with an attached Mohawk adornement.

Joe Sweeney

#4 THE SHINY SEVENTH

THE SHINY SEVENTH

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,205 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Essex
  • Interests:7th (city of london) Battalion
    Researching the Rainham War Memorial

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:45 PM

View PostJoe Sweeney, on 10 August 2012 - 05:40 PM, said:

it might be a proto punk with an attached Mohawk adornement.

Joe Sweeney

I think I prefer this answer :thumbsup:

#5 old owl

old owl

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,438 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Yorkshire, uk

Posted 10 August 2012 - 05:50 PM

View PostJoe Sweeney, on 10 August 2012 - 05:40 PM, said:


Other than that it might be a proto punk with an attached Mohawk adornement.

Joe Sweeney


"Put that man on a charge S'arnt Major." :whistle:

#6 dundeesown

dundeesown

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,636 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee

Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:47 PM

So we are going for a cover or Hawkeye :whistle:
Gary

#7 Mike_H

Mike_H

    Major

  • Old Sweats
  • 469 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey

Posted 10 August 2012 - 09:09 PM

That is a well used photo, I reckon it is a retouch that does not appear in the original.

ike

#8 munster

munster

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,420 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tipperary

Posted 10 August 2012 - 09:31 PM

looks like the cover on the man nearest camera helmet is on the way off.john

#9 Steven Broomfield

Steven Broomfield

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 11,177 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SO50, SW1 and South West Trains
  • Interests:10th Royal Hussars (PWO), 11th Hussars (PAO), The Royal Hussars (PWO), The King's Royal Hussars

Posted 11 August 2012 - 08:22 AM

View Postdundeesown, on 10 August 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:

So we are going for a cover or Hawkeye :whistle:
Gary
Don't see Hawkeye helping. No way that's LBW.

#10 dundeesown

dundeesown

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,636 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee

Posted 11 August 2012 - 11:03 AM

( Hawkeye ) as in last of the Mohicans.

#11 Bootnecks

Bootnecks

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunny CALIFORNIA
  • Interests:Allied WW.1 bayonets, specializing in Enfield 1907's, US. Pattern 1913's & Model 1917's.

Posted 02 November 2012 - 12:52 PM

I've seen this picture so many times now over the years, and it still facinates me for some unexplained reason. The whole image that this chaps helmet portrays is so sureal! Personaly, I tend to agree with 'Mike_H'. I do not think that its a part of the period original. Let me try and explain what I mean. Study the details of the items in the photograph, especially those that produce a shadow. Try and imagine the supposed item on the helmet, and visualise the shadow it would produce if it were to be in a certain angle.. say, either rolled up, or just being lifted by the wind! The item is supposed to be some form of helmet cover. The shadow to the right of the helmet addition actually curves away to the right of the helmet from approx the center. Yet the item on the helmet remains at the center. Also, the shadow does not follow what is actually being shown, and appears far to haevy. If you also look a little closer at the supposed cover, it is a series of heavy upward strokes, each stroke equal to the next... not natural, but consistant with a pencil.  All this leads me to believe that this is indeed a touched up photograph. A bit of artistic license perhaps? But for what reason? That I'm sure will be debated till the cows come home!

Seph

#12 FROGSMILE

FROGSMILE

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wherever the army sends me
  • Interests:Studying and researching British Army uniforms and insignia.

Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:55 PM

Personally I think it is just the expedient way that he found to carry a rolled/folded sand bag intended for a specific task.  We know that each wave had extra equipment specified for carriage forward.

#13 brucehubbard

brucehubbard

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,532 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maghull
  • Interests:Almost anything to do with the Western Front, dating from research into the war dead of Maghull and Ainsdale. Currently a tour guide, and loving it.

Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:02 PM

View Postdundeesown, on 11 August 2012 - 11:03 AM, said:

( Hawkeye ) as in last of the Mohicans.

Then he must be Uncas

Bruce

#14 skipman

skipman

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 7,814 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:aberfeldy

Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:43 PM

Does anyone know who took the original, and is this from same series Click ?

Mike

#15 Bootnecks

Bootnecks

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunny CALIFORNIA
  • Interests:Allied WW.1 bayonets, specializing in Enfield 1907's, US. Pattern 1913's & Model 1917's.

Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:53 PM

Yes Mike... it is from the same series.

Seph

#16 skipman

skipman

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 7,814 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:aberfeldy

Posted 02 November 2012 - 07:55 PM

Cheers Seph. It's the Somme right? Is it Brooks?

Mike

#17 Bootnecks

Bootnecks

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunny CALIFORNIA
  • Interests:Allied WW.1 bayonets, specializing in Enfield 1907's, US. Pattern 1913's & Model 1917's.

Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:22 PM

To tell you the truth Mike... I could not even guess at the photographers name. I have seen this series before though.. many times. If your able to study the actual series, you'll see that quite a few of the shell bursts are pencilled in. Quite common at the time, to sensationalise the shots for the general public. If that were actually the second wave going in... you'd not find the photographer standing where he is. There would be to much lead coming his way. This is actually reinforcements strolling up after the heaviest of the fighting as moved on. The series pans to the right, and the stretcher bear can clerly be seen in a few of the shots dissapearing in the distance. It is the Somme though, but what part, and at what point in the battle is not that clear.

Seph.

#18 FROGSMILE

FROGSMILE

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wherever the army sends me
  • Interests:Studying and researching British Army uniforms and insignia.

Posted 04 November 2012 - 08:20 PM

I agree that it could quite easily be (and probably is) a contrived scene for the cameras, but that does not stop the soldiers from being dressed and equipped as stipulated by their particular unit and formation for the advance.  That said I guess we will never know the truth of it.

#19 Bootnecks

Bootnecks

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,524 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunny CALIFORNIA
  • Interests:Allied WW.1 bayonets, specializing in Enfield 1907's, US. Pattern 1913's & Model 1917's.

Posted 04 November 2012 - 09:36 PM

Quite true.... we may never know!

#20 skipman

skipman

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 7,814 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:aberfeldy

Posted 04 November 2012 - 10:05 PM

The photograph appears on page 223 of The Illustrated War News Vol 2

Virtual Library

Mike

#21 Chris CPGW

Chris CPGW

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweat
  • 1,161 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Dales

Posted 04 November 2012 - 11:17 PM

View Postskipman, on 02 November 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

Does anyone know who took the original, and is this from same series Click ?

Mike

Mike, thie "stretcher bearer" photo is part of the the IWM collection No Q1309. Battle of Morval 25-28/09/16, by Lt Ernest Brooks.

Link http://www.iwm.org.u...bject/205193940

Regards

Chris

#22 skipman

skipman

    Lieut-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 7,814 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:aberfeldy

Posted 05 November 2012 - 06:22 AM

Thanks Chris. The image (Battle of Morval) doesn't seem to be available, I think this is the closest Click i wonder if it's in the original?

Mike

#23 dundeesown

dundeesown

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,636 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee

Posted 05 November 2012 - 08:42 AM

Thanks for all the links lads.
Gary.

#24 GRANVILLE

GRANVILLE

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 850 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Peak District
  • Interests:(In no particular order)
    The British 'Tommy'
    O Gauge garden model railway
    Meccano
    Classic cars
    Keeping a village shop going

Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:31 PM

I thought I'd bring this one back to life after I just read a one-liner in 'Realities of War' by Philip Gibbs which I'm reading yet again. On page 214 Gibbs is writing about Royal Fusiliers & Northumberland Fusiliers coming back from taking German trenches at St Eloi in 1915 when he writes: "Some of them had shawls tied to their helmets". Nothing more is said about it, but it was obviously unusual enough for him to have noted and commented on it. Any thoughts anyone?

David


PS I perhaps should have added that in the previous sentence he states: "Their steel helmets were covered with sand bagging......". So whatever the shawls were about they presumably were not to do with camouflage?