Jump to content


Remembered Today:

0

War and Victory Medal

experience required

6 replies to this topic

#1 khaki

khaki

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,353 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:04 PM

How does one determine whether a Great War pair started life as a pair or is actually a trio missing the star??

Thanks

khaki

#2 Sandie

Sandie

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,454 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:09 PM

You need to find the appropriate Medal Index Card  that will tell you what the soldier was awarded.
I'm not sure there is any other way of telling.

Sandie

#3 rkirb5

rkirb5

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 917 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryborough Australia
  • Interests:Family history and any army involvement

Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:23 PM

Apart from having their service records which would state them

regards

Robert

#4 old owl

old owl

    Brigadier-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 2,437 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Yorkshire, uk

Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:46 PM

View Postkhaki, on 14 August 2012 - 09:04 PM, said:

How does one determine whether a Great War pair started life as a pair or is actually a trio missing the star??

Thanks

khaki

If you post his details here, then I am sure that someone will assist you to find the relevent MIC :thumbsup:

Robert

#5 khaki

khaki

    Lieut-Colonel

  • Old Sweats
  • 1,353 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 August 2012 - 12:20 AM

Thanks for the replies, I don't have any names/medals that need researching, but my thoughts came from seeing medals sold being described as 'missing the star', I had thought that maybe there was a special technique, eg., service numbers, prefixes or regiments or maybe a combination of all three. Something like a regular army 'low' four digit service number which would suggest that the recipient would likely have been
entitled to a star medal and make a "pair" possibly a broken trio.

Is there any logic to my theory, or am I 'way off target'??

thanks

khaki

#6 DavidB

DavidB

    Major-General

  • Old Sweats
  • 3,241 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra
  • Interests:genealogy and classical music, Oh and WW1.

Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:21 AM

Khahi,
  A low service number wouldn't necessarily entitle a man to a medal, he would have to be in a war zone for that. Could have been sick and missed a draft

or any other number of reasons. Either the MIC, medal rolls or service documents are the only sure way of determining what medals he has been awarded.

#7 QSAMIKE

QSAMIKE

    Second Lieutenant

  • Members3
  • 81 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Home of the New West

Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:29 AM

With a low number he may have been a veteran of India or the Boer War and he may have been held back as an instructor in a training roll......

Mike