But has his contribution to the British army in the pre-1914 period been unjustly overlooked?
He must have had some positive qualities to be able to wipe the floor with the less well prepared and (I'm assuming) somewhat arrogant naval chiefs when he presented painstaklingly researched plans for the transportation and logistics of the BEF (to France) in the event of a Euro-conflict.
Can we make a quality judgement on this stroke of military politicking?
Any opinions on this character? Redeeming features? Or was he an arch conspirator as has been widely stated?
I'm browsing for stuff about him at the moment and I'd be interested in hearing broad opinions from those members who LURVE the debates on the higher ranks of military life!
Des












