QUOTE (Egypt @ Oct 12 2009, 07:15 PM)

Hello Leighbridge,
Further to your side-remarks concerning HMS Conway, please remember that the aim of this particular nautical training school was first and foremost to turn out officers equipped for service in the British merchant navy. Unlike Osborne, Conway was not an official Royal Navy establishment – in fact the title 'HMS Conway' was only an honorary distinction conferred on the school by Queen Victoria, thus allowing its cadets to wear RNR uniforms.
Many hundreds/thousands of old Conways served with distinction in the mercantile marine at a time when the British Merchant Navy was by far the largest in the world. On leaving Conway (parallel to their civilian employment) a large proportion of Conway cadets voluntarily accepted commissions in the Royal Naval Reserve and on the outbreak of hostilities in 1914 they went on to serve with great distinction under the white ensign.
Surely it's no surprise that relatively few Conway cadets choose to become regular RN officers (switching from Conway to Osbourne) since if it had always been their original intention to serve in the RN then these young men would have been better off joining Osbourne at the start, rather than Conway first.
Regards,
Michael ('Egypt')
My intention of mentioning HMS Conway was in no way meant to be taken as a insult or snub at this fine institution.
HMS Conway at the time stated it had limited acceptance to RNCO, but was able to gain addmitance to RNCD as well as the RNR.
The only intention here which i failed to mention was that at this time, 'parents' were desperate that their sons entering the navy were able to attian executive officer rank & by having their sons attend RNCO first then RNCD this was seen as the best chance for this to happen.
It was 'parents' who saw HMSC as a quick way to cram their sons for entry to RNCO.
As i stated, HMSC said themselves they could attain entry for boys to RNCD but only a few would be accepted at RNCO.
My only point from this was to show how the Admiralty were adamant they would not accept crammers (although this position changed as the war progressed).
Your point on joining RNCO first rather than HMSC is not correct, the age of intake at this time for RNCO was between 13 years 4 months & 13 years 8 months, this meant boys had to attend other schools beforre applying to join RNCO.
It should be noted that students from other schools who failed to enter RNCO went to HMSC to attian entry to RNCD.
It should also be noted that students attending HMSC wore shorts all year round rather than long pants, a sign that the school was not attached to the Royal Navy. Only naval schools supported or connected to the Royal Navy allowed students to wear long pants.
At this time in history boys were required to wear knickerboxers in winter, shorts in summer until their father permited them to wear long pants.
Amazingly, this was a small reason for boys wanting to enter RNCO, they would be allowed to wear long trousers.
It was also why those unable to afford the fees at RNCO or HMSC went to other RN training schools to become boy ratings as they also could wear long pants.
It sounds strange to us in these modern times but was a large part of a boys desire to attend certain schools.
Many letters home from cadets at RN schools asked their parents to buy them trousers to wear on their holidays as most cadets tended to wear their cadet uniforms on holiday rather than knickerboxers.
HRH Prince Edward of Wales & Prince's Albert & George spent all thier time while home from RNCO in cadet uniform knowing if they didnt they would have to wear knickerboxers.
Students from HMSC were accepted into the Merchant Marine, the course of training on HMSC counted as 1 years sea duty.
Most of those who entered the merchant navy ended up in the Royal Navy as they were transferred at the wars begining under the direction of the First Lord as the loss of Naval Officers was already known to be higher than the ability to train cadets.
This is why all cadets from RNCD were sent to sea at the end of 1914 as sea cadets. then at the start of 1915 the RNCO 5th term cadets were sent to RNCD as well as 6th term cadets it enabled the intake at RNCO to be raised to over 100 cadets a term.
The First Lord of the Admiralty Churchill stated to Parliment at the end of 1914 that the loss of British war ships would be held in check as the amount of ships being built would outpace the losses but the Admiralty knew that no matter how many ships werre built, it would be difficult to find officers to man them.
The problem for the Ravy Navy as well as the German's at this time was that ships built before 1906 on being hit below the water line (even with 1 hit) had a tendancy to roll over rather than sink upright this led to most ships crew as well as the bulk of its officers being trapped below the water line unable to escape.
This was one of the reasons the First Sea Lord Admiral Fisher was removing older ships from service as fast as he could.
The problem with ships during these years was balance or as it is known 'Metacentric Height', in 1870 HMS Captian while under sea trials in the Atlantic, vanished over night with the loss of her entire crew.
HMS Lord Warden reported that the ship had been stationed of her stern in the evening and by morning she had vanished.
It was believed she had listed while in heavy S.W. seas and unable to roll back, instead, rolled over.
Once again, I appologise to anyone who was offended by my remarks, there was no intention to demean or cast dispertions on those attending HMS Conway or any other naval school.