QUOTE (Ken Lees @ Jun 27 2006, 11:11 AM)

As long as we assume every other sentence is the product of 'journalistic creativity" no matter which waste paper it's printed on, we won't go far wrong.
All the usual nonesence is about to be wheeled out again, I fear.
How's that for grumpy?
As a one time photographer on two provincial daily papers I have to say that you'd be right to make your assumption. I often read reports, of events that I'd photographed, and found myself wondering if the reporter and I had been at the same event.
A useful test is to listen to or read carefully a report on a subject about which you have some expertise. You will often find that sections of the report are just plain wrong. My wife and I find this to be the case with law related matters. This innevitably leads you to wondering what else they are getting wrong.
I am afraid that you're right about the usual nonsense. The problem is that many reporters are simply not interested in the event they are covering to make much of an effort. The result is that cliches and pap get regurgitated.